Some of you commented on the 1st logo having an “W” that was too “E”-like. Here’s a line-up comparison of a blocky (original), medium, and sharp version. Seeing as I don’t really have an eye for design (or color), they all look good to me 
So, I turn to all of you, our beloved readers, for feedback.
What’s your vote?
- JC
Powered by Qumana
Yes, the previous W is a little too E-like. The other two are good but I like the middle one best.
i also like the middle one. what about making the ‘w’ a smidge wider like the pointy one on the right?
I vote for the middle one too! It’s consistent with the other letters and much easier on the eye.
actually kinda like the first one . . . keeps the font consistent w/ all the edges at right angles to each other. so the “w” looks like a sideways “e” . . . the “o” looks like a box and the “b” isn’t curvy either. if i have a problem w/ any letter its the “r” in operation.
I like the first one. The ‘W’ looking more like an ‘E’ makes the logo look modern & interesting as opposed to regular (almost boring). It also gives it a LED-number-display feel – which fits in with the tech theme of the name ‘Two Bit Operation’
Left one, bits and bytes should look like old school computer style font. I dig it
Thanks for the great feedback! I think Justin and I are both leaning back towards the original… we aim to make a final decision within the next week.
the blue guy is a little faint. it’s clear to me that whoever is the orange guy is the bolder guy. Or at least the guy who likes the color orange more.